1) Write the Null Hypothesis(Ho) for each inference analysis Analyses 4 Table 1 Descriptives Eating Style 95 Confidence Interval for Std Mean N Mear Deviation Std Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum Melayu 36 17 31 2 424 404 13 49 15 13 9 20 Cina 13 11 23 2 048 568 11 99 14 47 10 16 India 11 15 09 3 270 986 11 89 16 29 8 20 Total 60 14 54 2 518 325 13 38 14 68 B 20 Table 2 Eating Style Sum of Squares of Mean Square F Sig Between Groups 11 078 2 5 539 770 506 Within Groups 362 856 57 6 366 Total 373 933 59 Table 3 Multiple Comparisons Dependent Variable Eating Style Mean 95 Confidence Interval Difference (1 (1) Bangsa (J) Bangsa JJ Std Error Sig Lower Bound Upper Bound Tukey HSD Melayu Cina 1 075 816 392 89 3 04 India 215 869 967 1 88 2 31 Cina Melayu 1 075 816 392 3 04 89 India 860 1 034 685 3 35 1 63 India Melayu 215 869 967 2 31 1 88 Cina 860 1 034 685 1 63 3 35Table 4 Gaya Pemakanan Eating Style Subset for alpha 0 05 Bangsa N 1 Student Newman Keulsa b Cina 13 13 23 India 11 14 09 Melayu 36 14 31 Sig 470 Tukey HSDa b Cina 13 13 23 India 11 14 09 Melayu 36 14 31 Sig 470 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size 15 337 b The group sizes are unequal The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used Type I error levels are not guaranteed Table 3 Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp Sig (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 5 592 2 061 Likelihood Ratio 7 441 2 024 Linear by Linear Association 5 498 019 N of Valid Cases 60 a 1 cells (16 7 ) have expected count less than 5 The minimum expected count is 2 10 Table 4 Symmetric Measures Value Approx Sig Nominal by Nominal Phi 305 061 Cramer's V 305 061 Contingency Coefficient 292 061 N of Valid Cases 60Analyses 5 Table 1 Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Gender Types of Favourite Food 60 100 0 0 0 0 60 100 0 Table 2 Gender Types of Favourite Food Jenis makanan kegemaran Nasi Western Goreng Sandwich Food Total Gender Male Count 10 14 Expected Count 6 5 5 4 2 1 14 0 within gender responden kajian 71 4 28 6 0 0 100 0 within Jenis 35 7 17 4 0 0 23 3 makanan kegemaran Female Count 18 SL 46 Expected Count 21 5 17 6 6 9 46 0 within Gender 39 1 41 3 19 6 100 0 study respondents within Type 64 3 82 6 100 0 76 7 favourite food Total Count 28 23 60 Expected Count 28 0 23 0 9 0 60 0 within Gender 46 7 38 3 15 0 100 0 study respondents within Type 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 favourite food

Question

1) Write the Null Hypothesis(Ho) for each inference analysis  Analyses 4 Table 1 Descriptives Eating Style 95  Confidence Interval for Std  Mean N Mear Deviation Std  Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum Melayu 36 17 31 2 424 404 13 49 15 13 9 20 Cina 13 11 23 2 048 568 11 99 14 47 10 16 India 11 15 09 3 270 986 11 89 16 29 8 20 Total 60 14 54 2 518  325 13 38 14 68 B 20 Table 2 Eating Style Sum of Squares of Mean Square F Sig  Between Groups 11 078 2 5 539 770 506 Within Groups 362 856 57 6 366 Total 373 933 59 Table 3 Multiple Comparisons Dependent Variable  Eating Style Mean 95  Confidence Interval Difference (1  (1) Bangsa (J) Bangsa JJ Std  Error Sig  Lower Bound Upper Bound Tukey HSD Melayu Cina 1 075 816 392  89 3 04 India  215 869  967  1 88 2 31 Cina Melayu  1 075  816 392  3 04  89 India   860 1 034 685  3 35 1 63 India Melayu   215 869  967  2 31 1 88 Cina 860 1 034  685  1 63 3 35Table 4 Gaya Pemakanan  Eating Style Subset for alpha   0 05 Bangsa N 1 Student Newman Keulsa b Cina 13 13 23 India 11 14 09 Melayu 36 14 31 Sig  470 Tukey HSDa b Cina 13 13 23 India 11 14 09 Melayu 36 14 31 Sig   470 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed  a  Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size   15 337  b  The group sizes are unequal  The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used  Type I error levels are not guaranteed Table 3 Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp  Sig  (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 5 592 2 061 Likelihood Ratio 7 441 2 024 Linear by Linear Association 5 498 019 N of Valid Cases 60 a  1 cells (16 7 ) have expected count less than 5  The minimum expected count is 2 10  Table 4 Symmetric Measures Value Approx  Sig Nominal by Nominal Phi 305 061 Cramer's V  305  061 Contingency Coefficient 292 061 N of Valid Cases 60Analyses 5 Table 1 Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Gender  Types of Favourite Food 60 100 0  0 0 0  60 100 0  Table 2 Gender  Types of Favourite Food Jenis makanan kegemaran Nasi Western Goreng Sandwich Food Total Gender Male Count 10 14 Expected Count 6 5 5 4 2 1 14 0   within gender responden kajian 71 4  28 6  0 0  100 0    within Jenis 35 7  17 4  0 0  23 3  makanan kegemaran Female Count 18 SL 46 Expected Count 21 5 17 6 6 9 46 0   within Gender 39 1  41 3  19 6  100 0  study respondents   within Type 64 3  82 6  100 0  76 7  favourite food Total Count 28 23 60 Expected Count 28 0 23 0 9 0 60 0   within Gender 46 7  38 3  15 0  100 0  study respondents   within Type 100 0  100 0  100 0  100 0  favourite food

Accepted Answer

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Question

1) Write the Null Hypothesis(Ho) for each inference analysis. Analyses 4 Table 1 Descriptives Eating Style 95% Confidence Interval for Std. Mean N Mear Deviation

Step by Step Solution

Step: 1

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

Step: 2

Step: 3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Recommended Textbook for

Advanced Engineering Mathematics

Students also viewed these Mathematics questions

Question

Question

Question

Question

Question

Question

Question

Question

Question

Question

Question

Question

Question

Question