(1) Yorke v Ross Lucas Pty Ltd

(2) Holmes v Jones

Both of cases involved agents but the courts held was different: (1) case was regarded as an agent's misleading and deceptive conduct even though there were no information's accuracy or doubt.

(2) case, Agent has no duty of care to confirm whether the representation is true, so the agent just followed the vendor required.

Why both of these had different results about agent?