[10/02, 9:18 pm] Jagjot singh: There are two perspectives on this issue. One is with the emphasis on productivity and the other with center around ethics. We should talk about them individually. If there should be an occurrence of productivity, Premium Standard is right in heir methodology. They have followed an capitalistic approach that has given USA accomplishment throughout the ong term and zeroed in on productivity, output, profit and overall contribution to the economy. On the off chance that we consider free range hogs, they would require enormous areas to farm. This would accompany real estate cost, maintenance cost and different overheads that would build he cost of pork multifold. This thusly would affect the meat business and in general effect could be felt on USA food ndustry and economy. The attention on productivity permit Premium Standard to bring down their prices and remain competitive. Simultaneously it permits them to continue giving minimal cost meat which is a well known source of protein for a many people in the nation. Presently, on the off chance that we move the concentration to ethical perspectives, at that point we can see that this is anything but a customary product assembly line operation activity that we are managing. If there should arise an occurrence of manufacturing of products, hardware, and so on it is okay to zero in on productivity and efficiency. In any case, we are managing living beings that vibe torment, feelings (in a specific way), has intelligence and can be a social animal in nature. In this way, the treatment of keeping them restricted sn't right. Statistically, we can build up that they are physically I healthy (with just 1 % dying on before the time). In any case, heir psychological circumstance is likely something different. I This accommodates contemplation on how we manage our food and how we treat creatures who can't support hemselves. Along these lines ethically this treatment isn't ight. The inquiry reduces to a certain one thing, which is more l3i gnificant? The food business and the economical stand of he nation or the ethical stand of the creatures. Various ndividuals may have an alternate view yet discovering shared belief between the two will probably be inconceivable. [10/02, 9:19 pm] Jagjot singh: Productivity and ethical complications : The pig sow stall is an intense pig farming strategy and in the ongoing years such strategies for boosting productivity have gone under investigation by numerous animal welfare groups. The facts demonstrate that this strategy enables the organizations like Premium Standard to improve and build their productivity. It very well might be likewise obvious that just 1 % of the whole stocks die a premature death as a result of pig sow stall method however treating the sows so pitilessly while they are alive is absolutely unethical. There are abundant of research accessible that this method upsets the regular behaviour of the pigs and causes them physical and mental torment. It is experimentally demonstrated that pigs are clever and they go through a gigantic misery by such practice. It is unethical to torment a creature only for the pleasure of people. It is barbaric to make an impregnated sow stand in a stall where it can't move for 40 days. In the ongoing years the awareness about the brutal treatment of creatures has increased and numerous global organizations like Mc Donald's have confronted the repercussions for such unethical practices. Along these lines organizations like Premium need to comprehend the unethical nature of such practices and make a balance among productivity and ethics. Else they may confront negative outcomes in light of negative public image.