11. If Labory tries to sue "Great Toaster Inc." for explosion-related injuries he suffered as a result of trying to adapt the toaster so that he could cook chicken in it, the likely outcome of that lawsuit would be:

1. a)Labory wins, but only if he can prove a design defect, as it was too easy to modify the toaster.
2. b)Labory wins, but only if he can prove that the defenses of abuse and misuse apply.
3. c)"Great Toaster Inc." wins, but only if they can prove that the defenses of abuse and
4. misuse do not apply.
5. d)"Great Toaster Inc." wins, but only if they can prove a design defect, as it was too easy to
6. modify the toaster.

12. If the "old lady" tries to sue Shelly for injuries she suffered when Shelly ran through the red light and collided with her vehicle, the likely result would be:

1. a)Shelly wins because she tried to prevent the accident by stepping on the brakes and almost succeeded.
2. b)Shelly wins based on a reasonable person standard, as the "Old Lady" suffered injuries that an average person would not suffer.
3. c)The "Old Lady" wins.
4. d)Shelly wins because of Res Ipsa Loquitur.