Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

12. Consider a leveraged or unleveraged fund which is has exposure of X% to a broad stock market index (S&P 500) and exposure of 100%;X%

image text in transcribed

12. Consider a leveraged or unleveraged fund which is has exposure of X% to a broad stock market index (S&P 500) and exposure of 100%;X% to an approximately risk-free asset (Treasury bills, money market fund, or short-term bond fund). If 0% X% 100%, then the fund is long only and unleveraged; if X%! 100%, the fund is leveraged long; and if X% 0%, the fund is "short or leveraged short. Suppose that the market moves down 1%. Replace dots (...) in the table below with actual numbers to answer the following questions: What is the return on the fund (percent)? How much must the fund buy () or sell (i) to re-balance the fund's exposure (percent of fund's assets)? Is the fund's trading VITU LE LUI RUL, vay VALI ILIUNUL LULU) stabilizing (buying when market falls, selling when market rises) or destabilizing (selling when market falls, buying when market rises)? X exposure Return Buy (+) or Sell (-) Stabilizing or Destabilizing -300% -200% -100% -50% +0% +30% -0.30% +0.21% Stabilizing +50% +60% -0.60% +0.24% Stabilizing +90% +100% +150% +200% -2.00% -2.00% Destabilizing +300% Summarize the results in this table with one sentence and one mathematical formula. Why is the stabilizing or destabilizing effect of rebalancing a 3X levered long ETF different from the stabilizing or destabilizing effect of rebalancing a ;3X levered short ETF? 12. Consider a leveraged or unleveraged fund which is has exposure of X% to a broad stock market index (S&P 500) and exposure of 100%;X% to an approximately risk-free asset (Treasury bills, money market fund, or short-term bond fund). If 0% X% 100%, then the fund is long only and unleveraged; if X%! 100%, the fund is leveraged long; and if X% 0%, the fund is "short or leveraged short. Suppose that the market moves down 1%. Replace dots (...) in the table below with actual numbers to answer the following questions: What is the return on the fund (percent)? How much must the fund buy () or sell (i) to re-balance the fund's exposure (percent of fund's assets)? Is the fund's trading VITU LE LUI RUL, vay VALI ILIUNUL LULU) stabilizing (buying when market falls, selling when market rises) or destabilizing (selling when market falls, buying when market rises)? X exposure Return Buy (+) or Sell (-) Stabilizing or Destabilizing -300% -200% -100% -50% +0% +30% -0.30% +0.21% Stabilizing +50% +60% -0.60% +0.24% Stabilizing +90% +100% +150% +200% -2.00% -2.00% Destabilizing +300% Summarize the results in this table with one sentence and one mathematical formula. Why is the stabilizing or destabilizing effect of rebalancing a 3X levered long ETF different from the stabilizing or destabilizing effect of rebalancing a ;3X levered short ETF

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Sam Bankman Fried

Authors: Evelyn Everlore

1st Edition

979-8866401925

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions