13. Let's assume that the grill at issue in this fact patters was actually defective. Some relevant folks told Paul that he should consider suing the manufacturer for product liability based on negligence even though he could sue based on strict liability. Would it be advantages for Paul to bring a cause of action based on negligence even though it would be easier to win based on strict liability? a) Yes, because if he can prove that the manufacturer was negligent he will likely get more money from the jury. b) No, because negligence is an element of strict liability anyway. c) Yes, because strict liability is an element of negligence. d) All of the above