Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

14.1 Statute of Frauds Hoffman v. Sun Valley Company 102 Idaho 187, 628 P.2d 218, 1981 Ida. Lexis 320 (Supreme Court of Idaho, 1981) Case:

14.1 Statute of Frauds Hoffman v. Sun Valley Company 102 Idaho 187, 628 P.2d 218, 1981 Ida. Lexis 320 (Supreme Court of Idaho, 1981)

Case: Fritz Hoffman and Fritz Frey contacted the Sun Valley Company (Company) about purchasing a 1.64-acre piece of property. A representative of Company authorized to sell the property reached an agreement with them, and sent a letter confirming the conversation and the terms of the agreement.

Issue: Before the documents were executed by either side, Sun Valley Company sold all its assets, including the Ruud Mountain property, to another purchaser. When the new owner refused to sell the Ruud Mountain lot to Hoffman and Frey, they brought this action for specific performance of the oral contract.

Critical Legal Thinking Question: Yes/No, Do Hoffman and Frey win? Explain why?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Business Law Legal Environment Online Commerce Business Ethics and International Issues

Authors: Henry R. Cheeseman

9th edition

978-0134529530, 134004000, 134529537, 978-0134004006

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

How many sink SCCs in the above graph?

Answered: 1 week ago