looking to get some help with the below case study, the questions I am needing help with are at the end of the case study.

Thank you in advance for all your help

Case Study: Removal Order

Gustavo filed an application for permanent residence in Canada at the Sydney visa office in November 2008. At that time Gustavo was single. After a long wait, his application came up for processing in February 2012. Gustavo was asked to submit updated information and undergo a medical examination. Gustavo complied with the medical examination, but did not inform the visa office that he had married Stephanie, an Australian national, in December 2011. Gustavo felt that disclosing his change of marital status would cause further delays in the processing of his application. On January 10, 2013, Gustavo arrived at Vancouver International Airport. During the examination, Gustavo admitted to the CBSA officer that he had been married while his application was in process and that he wished to sponsor Stephanie once he is allowed into Canada as a permanent resident. The CBSA officer refused to grant Gustavo permanent resident status, but allowed him to enter Canada. Gustavo has come to your office on January 12, 2013 and would like to appeal.

1. What steps would the CBSA officer take now that he has found out that Gustavo is inadmissible to Canada?

2. What is the name of the proceeding that will take place at the Immigration Division and who will be present at such a proceeding?

3. Explain the role of the hearings officer to Gustavo.

4. In your opinion, what would be the decision of the Immigration Division?