19. Grover initiates a breach of contract action against Todd. Grover claims the contract, which was reduced to writing, called for Todd to deliver 200 crates of peaches by a certain date. At trial, Todd wishes to testify that the contract only called for delivery of 100 crates. Grover makes a best evidence rule objection.

a. The court should sustain the objection.

b. The court should overrule the objection because a contract is an agreement brought about by the meeting of two minds, not by writing. The writing is only a memorandum of the agreement, not the contract itself.

c. The court should overrule the objection because Todd is not testifying about the contents of the writing, but about his understanding of the agreement.

d. The court should overrule the objection because the central issue in the case concerns the terms of the agreement, and the jury is entitled to hear Todd's interpretation of the terms.

e. None of the above.