1.Bong bought a land from Jun five (5) years ago. Bong admits that there is an

annotated adverse claim of a certain Lino that he bought the land from the

owner. However, the said annotation was already canceled. Lino is claiming

that he owned the land since this was first sold to him. He further stated that

he could recover the property since Bong had knowledge that it was sold to

him through the annotation of adverse claim.

Is Lino correct? Why or why not?

2.S purchased a lot. When he tried to transfer the lot into his name, it was

discovered that the owner sold it to T (another person). T, the new buyer, was

able to register it first in his name.

Who has a better right over the lot?