Question
1.Given the adverse effects of having a merger and acquisition, employees can be laid off in droves. With this in mind, should companies still continue
1.Given the adverse effects of having a merger and acquisition, employees can be laid off in droves. With this in mind, should companies still continue with this practice
just to overtake the competition, even if it means that you will sacrifice the
careers and personal lives of employees? Explain.
2.What do you think is the main advantage of mergers and acquisitions in terms of
employee welfare? Explain your side.
3.There will be displaced employees all over the place after this M&A. Using the
Kanthian principle of ethics, how can companies benefit from this theory, post-
merger? Explain thoroughly.
4.Do you think that employees have the right and power to reject the principle of
merging with a company? Explain your answers.
5.Before an M&A happens, do you think it is ethically right for the management to
consult first with the employees (or labor union) if their move is correct? Explain.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started