Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

1.The Supreme Court has determined that anonymous free speech is protected under the First Amendment; yet the ability to post anonymous comments on the Internet

1.The Supreme Court has determined that anonymous free speech is protected under the First Amendment; yet the ability to post anonymous comments on the Internet has resulted in more hate speech.Where is the line between constitutionally protected anonymity and the dangers of hate speech without attribution?

2.The German government is requiring Facebook, Google and Twitter to help put an end to online hate speech, which Germany defines as inciting violent or harmful action.These organizations must remove hate speech within 24 hours of it being reported.Will this requirement change the Internet as we know it?What are the downsides of this policy?

3.There are two major ways to deal with offensive speech.One way is to restrict free speech to outlaw offensive speech.The other way is to encourage even more free speech to allow the "marketplace of ideas" to prevail over offensive speech.Which approach do you prefer and why?

4.What if you find certain speech offensive, but most others do not?How should that issue be resolved?That is, who gets to determine what is offensive?Should the government make that determination?Are there any downsides to that approach?If so, what are they?

5.Is there a difference between the government banning offensive speech and a privately owned social media company banning what it deems to be offensive speech?If so, what is the difference?If not, how do you reconcile your position with the First Amendment?Does the First Amendment apply to social media?Why or why not?

6.What are organization European Digital Rights and the organization Access Now?Both do not support the European Union's Code of Conduct with respect to Internet speech.Why do they oppose it?

7.Do you agree with the author of one of the articles posted on the Content page that you are among the generation that hates speech?Is your generation too sensitive to differing ideas?Why or why not?

8.Should a university campus administration or student organization be allowed to discipline students for speech that is protected by the United States Constitution?Why or why not?Is your answer the same for a state university and a private university?

9.Some commentators claim that your generation cannot handle free speech and so they refer to your generation as "cupcakes" or "snow flakes" that need "safe spaces" because your feelings are so delicate.Is this a fair characterization of your generation?Why or why not?

10.Is there free speech at work?What limits can your employer enforce on free speech at work on social media?What rights does an employee have at work concerning speech?What laws and contracts could limit an employee's free speech?

nothing is missing please help if you can

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

The Law Of Torts

Authors: Joseph W. Glannon

6th Edition

1543807690, 978-1543807691

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Demonstrate knowledge of the company/organization and the position.

Answered: 1 week ago