2) Firdaus, the original owner of a red BMW entrusted his car to a mechanic named Saiful for repairs to be carried out on the car. Saiful also owned a shop that sells second-hand cars at a nearby town. Shortly after obtaining Firdaus's car and repairing it, Saiful put the car on display at his shop. Saiful received an offer for the car from Ratna and sold the car to Ratna for RM 85,000. Upon discovering this, Firdaus decided to take legal action against Ratna on the ground that she was not entitled to the car. Advise Ratna.12.1.X.1. 1.2 . 1. 3 . 1. 4 . 1. 5 . 1 . 6 . 1 . 7 . 1 . 8 . 1 . 9 . 1 . 10 . 1 . 11 . 1 . 12. 1 . 13 . 1.14. 1 . 15 . 1 4 . 1. 17 . 1. 18. Issue: Whether Ratna can fight back against Firdaus allegations for not being entitled to kept the car under the law of Sale of Goods Act 1957? Laws : Sect 4(1) - Definition SOGA Sect. 2 soga - future goods definition= goods to be manufactured or produced or acquired by the seller after the making of the contract of sale and specific goods definition (future goods & specific goods are type of goods) Sect 12(3) - term of contract (warranty) Sect 14(b) - Implied warranty as to quiet possession Case: Microbeads AG v Vinhurst Road Markings Ltd General Rule Transfer of title - Sect. 27(1) soga Case: Pearson v Rose & Young Ltd [1950] Exceptions Sale by mercantile agent - Sect. 27 soga Case: Folkes v King (1923) Application : Conclusion : In conclusion, Ratna was able to fight against Firdaus under Section 14(b) of Sale of Goods Act 1957 as Ratna buy the car in good faith and had not received notice that Saiful has no authority to sell the car. bility: Investigate