Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

2. Mining is proposed for Wonderful Wilderness. This area provides two benets: recreation (it is known for its remarkable backpacking opportunities) and biodiversity (it is

image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
2. Mining is proposed for Wonderful Wilderness. This area provides two benets: recreation (it is known for its remarkable backpacking opportunities) and biodiversity (it is a unique habitat for endangered wildlife and plants). The mining is expected to reduce backpacking visits from its current level of 10,000 recreation visitor-days [RVDs, a measure of recreational use) per year to 4000 RVDs/year for the next 10 years; after that time, recreational use would partially rebound to 7000 RVDs/year into perpetuity. If the mine is not opened, recreational use is expected to continue at current levels into perpetuity. Mining is expected to bring prots of $1 million/year for the 10 years of the mining operation. (You need to use a calculator or computer to answer the questions.) (a) What is the present value of mining in the area (excluding effects on recreation) if the interest rate is 6 percent? If it is 3 percent? (b) If one RVD of backpacking is worth $P, what is the present value of recreation in the area if it is mined? If it is not mined? (Hint: Your answer will be $P times some number.) Again, do the calculation using both a 6 percent and a 3 percent discount rate. (c) How much would an RVD of backpacking have to be worth (i.e., what is P) to make the benets of mining worth less than the benefits of not mining, considering only the benets and costs of mining and recreation, not biodiversity? Do the calculation for both 6 percent and at 3 percent. (d) Suppose that travel cost studies determined that an RVD of backpacking in Wonderful Wilderness is worth $80/RVD. Would preservation be the efficient solution, considering only the benefits and costs of recreation and mining, at 6 percent? At 3 percent? If so, under what conditions, if any, might mining nevertheless be the efcient solution? If not, how much would the area's value for habitat have to be worth in present value to make mining not worthwhile? (f) Which interest rate makes the best case for mining? Why? (g) One option for the area is to delay mining for 10 years. If an RVD of backpacking is worth $80, what is the present value of this alternative? How does: it cnmnare tn the nresent value nf' minim: the area in the nresent

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Bank Management

Authors: Timothy W Koch, Steven Scott MacDonald, S Scott MacDonald

6th Edition

0324289278, 9780324289275

More Books

Students also viewed these Economics questions

Question

3. What is my goal?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

2. I try to be as logical as possible

Answered: 1 week ago