Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
2 out of 2 points Which one of the following citations is the correct case citation in Bluebook format for the following federal court case:
2 out of 2 points Which one of the following citations is the correct case citation in Bluebook format for the following federal court case: Rajko Ljutica, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr., Secretary Janet A. Napolitano, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Deputy Director Michael Aytes, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, New York District Director Andrea J. Quarantillo, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Defendant-Appellees, argued on April 16, 2009, before the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, and decided on December 3, 2009. The court's decision appears in volume 588 of the Federal Reporter, third edition, starting on page 119. Question 2 2 out of 2 points Which one of the following citations is the correct case citation in Bluebook format for the following federal court case: Grote Industries, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, Grote Industries, Inc. an Indiana corporation, William D. Grote, III, William Dominic Grote, IV, Walter F. Grote, Jr., Michael R. Grote, W. Frederick Grote, III, John R. Grote, Plaintiffs, versus Kathleen Sebelius in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Hilda L. Solis in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, Timothy Geithner in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury, United States Department of the Treasury, Defendants, heard by the United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, New Albany Division. The case was decided on December 27, 2012, and published in the 914 volume of the Federal Supplement, Second Edition, starting on page 943. Question 3 2 out of 2 points Which one of the following citations is the correct case citation in Bluebook format for the following federal court case: Superior Oil Company, Appellee, versus Huey Fulmer; James Branch; Roy Nichols and any other persons claiming an interest in property described further in these pleadings, Appellants. Superior Oil Company, Appellant, versus Huey Fulmer; James Branch; Roy Nichols and any other persons claiming an interest in property described further in these pleadings, Appellees. The case was submitted on June 10, 1985, to the United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, and decided on March 5, 1986. The decision appears on page 252 of the 785 volume of the Federal Reporter, Second Edition
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started