2. Personal/Cyber Jurisdiction. Paulina finally makes the move to buy a food cart. She buys a used food cart. The seller tells her everything works well except certain parts of the plumbing system need to be updated but don't have to be replaced. She does some research on the Internet and finds an outfit called BuilderCart in Portland, Oregon that builds and repairs food carts. She calls and speaks with its owner, Joe. Paulina asks Joe to update her food cart, but Joe declines and states that he only services food cart owners in the greater Portland areas. Joe, however, directs Paulina to his website for some self-help. She goes onto BuilderCart's website and finds step-by-step instructions to diagnose and possibly fix the plumbing issue. Paulina does as instructed by the website. After spending a few hours trying to fix the problem herself, she finally calls another outfit in Vancouver to help her. The repairperson tells Paulina that she "really messed up" the entire plumbing system and that the initial problem could have been easily fixed by simply getting a new pipe. Now Paulina has to replace the entire system. Paulina is upset at BuilderCart website for giving her bad instructions that worsen the problem. She wants to sue BuilderCart in Washington State Court for the cost of replacing the plumbing system. Can the state court in Washington exercise personal or cyber jurisdiction over BuilderCart, who is from Oregon? Discuss