2. Suppose that there is an empty apartment in Bloomsbury which UCL owns and is thinking of renting out. There are two families interested in renting the apartment. Family A values the apartment at 1000 per month, while family B values it at 1500 a month. Your friend Bob tells you that he thinks that family A should get the apartment because it is poorer than family B. Is this Pareto efcient? Can you think of a better outcome which does not upset family A? Carefully explain