25. On January 1 of this year, Sharon Seeker and her real estate agent, WhatzUp Realty, mailed a written offer to Marian Landy for the purchase of a large parcel of property Landy owned. The offer included the usual terms, plus: "This offer will expire on February 1st, if the offeree has not caused an acceptance to be received by the offeror on or before that date." The first thing on the morning on February 1st, Marian Landy sent a letter via messenger for same day delivery accepting Seeker's offer; however, the messenger service negligently failed to deliver the letter until February 2nd. On February 4th, Sharon Seeker entered into a contract to purchase a different parcel of land from another seller and did not initially inform Marian Landy of the transaction. Not having heard back from Sharon, Marian contacted Sharon by phone on February 10th, and at that time, Sharon told Marian she was not going to buy the property from her. Which of the following is the most correct statement about whether there was a legally binding contract between Sharon Seeker and Marian Landy? O No answer text provided. O A. No contract between Sharon and Marian arose on February 2 O B. A contract would have arisen if the letter of acceptance had been mailed on February 1 instead of sent via messenger O C. Sharon's silence constituted an acceptance of Marian's letter O D. A voidable contract arose on February 126. Charles, aged 17, wanted to buy a car. His father offered to help but Charles insisted on doing it himself. Charles went to a car dealer and signed papers to purchase a brand new Corvette. A week later, Charles saw a Porsche he liked better. He took the Corvette back to the dealership, but the dealer said they would not take the Vette back because it was used. Is the dealer on solid legal grounds? 0 No answer text provided. 0 A. Yes, a minor is responsible for the fair market value of life's necessities O B. No, because a contract with a minor is voidable O C. Yes, if the dealer's sales agent was over 18 O D. No, because Charles used the car for a week. 27. Tony and Bobby were high college freshmen. After class one day, they went together to a fast food restaurant on campus. The two were seated at a table near the front counter and were discussing their upcoming nal exams when another student, Doug, sat down at a table next to theirs. Doug, being a jokster, shot a spitball from a straw toward Bobby who was seated with his back to Doug. The spitball went astray and instead struck Tony in the eye, causing him to suffer damage to the cornea of his left eye. When the spitball struck Tony, he cried out in pain. Upon hearing this, the cashier ran over to Tony, but before she was able to reach him, she slipped on some crushed food that had fallen on the oor. If the cashier sues Doug, she can recover for: O No answer text provided. 0 A. Assault 0 B. Battery 0 C. Negligence O D. Nothing, because the injury was not reasonably forseeable