25. The State of Indiana agrees with the Ace Construction Company that Ace will do some repair work on a bridge. The: agreement, however, does not specify the exact work 10 be done, the quality standards Ace must meet, and the time the job must be completed. Also, the agreement states an ambiguous formula for determining Ace's compensation. Later, before either it or the state has done anything, Ace backs out of the job. Then it is sued by the state. Ace defends by arguing 'that the contract fails because it (or the offer) is indenite. Which of the following is true? A) Ace's argument is correct and the state cannot recover. B) Ace's argument is no good because here the parties obviously intended to make a contract. C) Ace's argument is no good because here the court has a reasonably certain basis for giving an appropriate remedy. D) Ace's argument is no good because here the parties obviously intended to make a contract, and the court has a reasonably certain basis for giving an appropriate remedy