Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

26. Michael Fermin, without the authority of Pascual Lacas, owner of a car, sold the same car in the name of Mr. Lacas to Atty.

image text in transcribed
26. Michael Fermin, without the authority of Pascual Lacas, owner of a car, sold the same car in the name of Mr. Lacas to Atty. Buko. The contract between Atty. Buko and Mr. Lacas is --- a) void because of the absence of consent from the owner, Mr. Lacas. b) valid because all of the essential requisites of a contract are present. c) unenforceable because Michael Fermin had no authority but he sold the car in the name of Mr. Lacas, the owner. d) rescissionbecause the contract caused lesion to Atty. Buko

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Fundamental Financial Accounting Concepts

Authors: Thomas P. Edmonds, Frances M. Mcnair, Philip R. Olds, Mark Edmonds, Christopher Edmonds

10th Edition

126015940X, 978-1260159400

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

6. How can hidden knowledge guide our actions?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

7. How can the models we use have a detrimental effect on others?

Answered: 1 week ago