Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
26 of 27 25.0 Points On June 21, 2001, a federal grand jury in the United States indicted 13 Saudi Arabian nationals and one Lebanese
26 of 27 25.0 Points On June 21, 2001, a federal grand jury in the United States indicted 13 Saudi Arabian nationals and one Lebanese national in connection with the truck bombing that killed 19 members of the American military services and wounded nearly 400 others in an apartment building in Saudi Arabia in 1996. The building was being used as a barracks for U.S. military service personnel. The bombing allegedly was pursuant to an organized terrorist agenda designed to drive Americans out of the Persian Gulf region. Currently, eleven of the suspects are in Saudi custody, and three are still fugitives. Saudi Arabia has refused to extradite any of the suspects in their custody. The U.S. has no extradition treaty with Saudi Arabia. The Saudi Arabian government asserted that the United States has no right to prosecute any persons involved in an incident that occurred in Saudi Arabia. The Saudi Arabian Defense Minister was quoted as saying that any legal steps in the case "fall within the jurisdiction of Saudi Arabia." The Interior Minister was quoted as saying, "No other entity has the right to try or investigate any crimes occurring on Saudi lands." Is the Saudi Arabian Interior Minister correct? Discuss in detail the arguments both for and against the Saudi position. Be sure to address the distinction between prescriptive, enforcement, and adjudicative jurisdiction. Make sure your citations are in proper Bluebook format. Your answer must be at least 500 words Question 27 of 27 25.0 Points The rights of individuals are often overlooked as secondary to the interests and desires of the sovereign state, but the concepts of erga omnes (commitment to international law) and jus cogens (peremptory norms) are the governing agents of human rights legislation, creating a fundamental basis for the protection of individuals under sovereign nations. Discuss the evolution of international human rights legislation and law. Use specific examples and include footnotes to both the text and another source to support your argument. Make sure your citations are in proper Bluebook format. Your answer must be at least 500 words
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started