2.Please explain the rationale employed by the Court in deciding Bad Frog Brewery v NY State Liquor Control Authority, (First Amendment-Commercial Speech) which we covered in the lecture. (i.e. what is the test the Court uses to balance the competing interests, what questions did the Court ask?)

2.And Can you explain the opposite result in the case of MainstreamMarketing v FTC & FCC ?

You have posted copies of both cases