3. An exception to the doctrine of privity of contract arises when a contract is intended to benefit a Party a. Ancillary b. Second c. Third d. Subsidiary a. 4. This case primarily deals with a notice of assignment of rights and duties b. a delegation of a duty c. the rights of a third-party beneficiary S. is the promisor in this case Isaacs b. LSM C. Logan-Baldwin is the Promises Isaacs b. LSM c. Logan-Baldwin 7. is the third party Isaacs b. LSM c. Logan-Baldwin 8 I A third party that is considered an intended beneficiary to a contract for breach of contract 6. sue the promisor sue the promiser h can not 9. A third party that is considered an incidental beneficiary to a contract for breach of contract con can not b 10. In determining whether a beneficiary is an intended or incidental beneficiary, the presence of one or more of the following factors strongly indicates that the third party is an intended beneficiary to the contract: whether performance is rendered (directly indirectly partially) to the third party, if the third party has a right to contact the performing party control details of the performance/rescind the contract), and if the third party is (expressly designated in the contract/a signer on the contract/ related to one of the parties to the contract). 11. Was Isaacs' performance directly to Logan-Baldwin? (Yes/No). 12. Did Logan-Baldwin have the right to control the details of Isaacs' performance? (Yes/No). 13. Did Logan-Baldwin expressly appear as a beneficiary in the contract? (Yes/No). 14. Although a factor to be considered an intended beneficiary under the contract, the name "Logan- Baldwin" (musteed not) expressly appear in the terms of the contract. 15. As a result of performance being rendered directly to Logan-Baldwin, and Logan-Baldwin's right to control the details of performance, Logan-Baldwin will likely be considered an (intended/incidental) beneficiary 16. As an intended beneficiary, Logan-Baldwin (can/cannot) sue to enforce the contract. 17. Is it likely that the court would have ruled in favor of Logan-Baldwin? (Yes/No)