3. Case Involving a Paralegal Representing client in Youth Court a) Review the case of R v K.P.D. [2015] O.J. No. 828

i) What is the nature of the proceedings? ii) What level of the court was this matter heard in? iii) Do you agree or disagree with the court in the assessment of the scope of a paralegal's authority in under the Youth Criminal Justice Act? Make reference to applicable sections of the legislation used in the case.

b) Comment on the distinction that is made regarding a lawyers' ability to "practice law" and a paralegal's ability to offer "legal services". How does this distinction impact on your future goals? Refer to Law Society of Ontario By-Law 4.

c) Discuss the importance of the examination of the Youth Criminal Justice Act made by Justice Cohen as it pertains to the Paralegal's request to represent this client. Why is this examination done?

d) Provide your commentary on whether as an aspiring licensed paralegal that you agree or disagree with the decision and provide reasons to support your answer. In particular, should the scope of paralegals be broadened or remain the status quo.