Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

3. What is the total term debt outstanding on the balance sheet (statement of financial position) at September 25, 2021? Why is the term debt

image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
3. What is the total term debt outstanding on the balance sheet (statement of financial position) at September 25, 2021? Why is the term debt shown this way? Find the table of future principal repayments in Note 7. What is the purpose of this table? 4. Using Note 10, provide the journal entries for the fiscal 2021 'Cost of warranty claims' of $2,674 (in millions) and the $2,684 'Accruals for product warranty'. Note 7 - Debt Commercial Paper and Repurchase Agreements The Company is secured short-term pembory notes (Commercial Paper put to a comercial paper program The Company uses et proceeds from the commercial paper program for general corporate purpos, cluding dividends and she repurchase. As of September 25 2021 and September 28, 2020, the Company had 580 billion and $5 billion of Commercial Paper cutstanding, respectively, with mature generally less than nine monte The weighted average interest rate of the Company Commercial Paper was 0.00 and of September 2009 and September 26, 2000. recruty The filowing table provides a summary of cash flows associated wth the sunce and matures of Commercial Paper for 221,2000 and 2010 in miliona 2021 2020 2010 Maulties days or less Proceede trompa comercial paper (357) 100S Maturtles greater than any Proceed to commer Repayments of commercial paper Proceeds from Repayments of commercial paper, Total proceeds from repayments of commercial paper.net 7,046 18.567) 1,370 6105 (7241 (1.06 13.894 16.000 2.720 1.0223 196315 15.971 Continuation of Note 7 - Debt Term Debt As of September 25, 2021, the Company has standing foating and come notes with varying mature for an aggregate principal amount of $118.1 billion collectively the The Notes are senior cured obligations and interest is payable in wears. The following table provides a summary of the Company's serm debt as of September 25, 2001 and September 2000 Matures Amount Erective Amour Erective called your home where are coming ware Mate 2002 1.750 04-05 2200 2004-13 2009-2010 5.813 0.09.47% 103.300 - 478 2013-20 Foring Foto 0000.0 Second 2001 F 700% -2,600 Pour de 400-250 Tere! 2000-2001 14.000 0.70-2.315 2000-2001 -20% 3.500 118.063 100 Urande 014 Hege accounting torvet 1.09 1.6 Liportion of om det i77 To portion for To manage interest rate rok on certain of its US dollar-denominated feed-or floating rate noto, the Company has entered into interest rate wape to effectively convert the food interest rates to floating norest rates or the boating interest rates to fred interest rates on a portion of those note. Additional to manage foreign currency risk on certain of storio currency denominated to the Company has entered in foreign currency to effectively convert these not to US doo denominados The effective worest rates for the Nole incluse the interest on the Notes anonication of the discount or premium and applicatie, adjustments related to heagire. The Company recognized $2.6 billion, 528 billion and $3.2 billion of interest expense on is term det for 2021 2020 and 2019. respectively The future principal payments for the Company's Note as of September 25, 2021, are as follows (in milioni 2022 0.583 11,391 2014 10.200 2025 10,914 2020 11.400 Therler Total met 118.063 2023 54585 Note 10- Commitments and Contingencies Accrued Warranty and Guarantees The following table shows changes in the Company's accrued warranties and related costs for 2021, 2020 and 2019 (in millions): $ Beginning accrued warranty and related costs Cost of warranty claims Accruals for product warranty Ending accrued warranty and related costs 2021 3,354 5 (2,674) 2,684 3,364 $ 2020 3,570 $ (2,956) 2.740 3,354 $ 2019 3,692 (3.857) 3,735 3,570 s Unconditional Purchase Obligations The Company has entered into certain off-balance sheet commitments that require the future purchase of goods or services (unconditional purchase obligations"). The Company's unconditional purchase obligations primarily consist of payments for content creation, Internet and telecommunications services and supplier arrangements. Future payments under noncancelable unconditional purchase obligations having a remaining term in excess of one year as of Septomber 25, 2021, are as follows (in millions): 2022 4,551 2023 2,165 2024 984 2025 405 2026 51 Thereafter 28 Total 8.184 Continuation of Note 10 - Commitments and Contingencies Contingencies The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and that have not been fully resolved. The outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain. When a loss related to a legal proceeding or claim is probable and reasonably estimable, the Company accrues its best estimate for the ultimate resolution of the matter. If one or more legal matters were resolved against the Company in a reporting period for amounts above management's expectations, the Company's financial condition and operating results for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected. In the opinion of management, there was not at least a reasonable possibility the Company may have incurred a material loss, or a material loss greater than a recorded accrual, concerning loss contingencies for asserted legal and other claims, except for the following matters: Vimnet Vimotx, Inc. (VimetX") filed a lawsuit against the Company alleging that certain of the Company's products infringe on patents owned by Vinetx. On April 11, 2018. a jury returned a verdict against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastem District of Texas (the "Eastern Texas District Court). The Company appealed the verdict to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which remanded the case back to the Eastern Texas District Court, where a retrial was held in October 2020. The jury retumed a verdict against the Company and awarded damages of $503 milion, which the Company has appealed. The Company has challenged the validity of the patents at issue in the retral at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the "PTO"). and the PTO has declared the patents invalid, subject to further appeal by Vimex ios Performance Management Cases On April 5, 2018, several U.S.federal actions alleging violation of consumer protection laws, fraud computer intrusion and other causes of action related to the Company's performance management feature used in its iPhone operating systems, introduced to certain iPhones in iOS updates 10.2.1 and 11.2 were consolidated through a Multidistrict Litigation process into a single action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Califomia (the Northern Califomia District Court. On February 28, 2020, the parties in the Multidistrict Litigation reached a settlement to resolve the U.S. federal and Califomia state class actions. On March 18, 2021, the Northern California District Court granted final approval of the Multidistrict Litigation settlement, which will result in an aggregate payment of $310 million to settle all claims. The Company continues to berieve that its iPhones were not detective, that the performance management feature introduced with iOS updates 1021 and 112 was intended to and did, improve customers' user experience, and that the Company did not make any misleading statements or fail to disclose any material information French Competition Authority On March 16, 2020, the French Competition Authority (FCA) announced is decision that aspects of the Company's sales and distribution practices in France violate French competition law, and issued a fine of 1.1 billion. The Company strongly disagrees with the FCA's decision, and has appealed Optis Optis Wireless Technology, LLC and related entities (Optis) lled a lawsuit in the US. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against the Company alleging that certain of the Company's products infringe on patents owned by Optis. On August 11, 2020, a jury retumed a verdict against the Company and awarded damages. In post-trial proceedings, the damages portion of the verdict was set aside. A retrial on damages was held in August 2021 and the jury in that proceeding awarded damages of $300 million against the Company, which the Company plans to appeal

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions