Question
3. XXX incorporated is engage in tour and travel business. A group of Mandarin -speaking people availed the services of XXX Inc. for an educational
3. XXX incorporated is engage in tour and travel business. A group of Mandarin -speaking people availed the services of XXX Inc. for an educational trip in IlocosNorte scheduled on June 23, 2012. In one past occasions, the General Manager of XXX Inc. had a heated argument with the Governor of IlocosNorte. The day before the tour, some of the tourists were suffering from ulcer which pain can be cured by taking up kremel Z medicine, this fact was overheard by the Governor. The latter with the help of the city council passed an ordinance banning them to enter in the said destination from June 23 to July 30, 2012 citing the sickness of the tourists as reason for banning. Is the banning of the tour legal?
A. Yes, because there is a public health issue, hence, the right to travel can be impaired.
B. No, because the Governor has no legal authority to enforce an ordinance.
C. Yes, simply because there was an ordinance, the same should be respected
D. No, because the issue of health in the given facts is not contagious that affects the public, therefore the banning is not legal, and it violates the right to travel
6. Manuel is an employee of Baylove Hotel. He saw his childhood crush Susana with her boyfriend Sosano entering room 96 of the said hotel. Considering that the hotel is already old and dilapidated, Manuel was able to make a small opening from the other side of the room to peep Susana and Sosano. When the two are performing sexual acts, Manuel brought out his cell phone and took a video over them. Was there any law that have been violated by Manuel?
a. Yes, Manuel violated the bill of rights of Susana and Sosano particularly the right to privacy under article 3 section 3 of the said bill of rights.
b. Yes, Manuel violated the anti-wiretapping law.
c. Yes, Manuel violated the anti-photo and video voyeurism act
d. Yes, Manuel violated the law stated in letter a and c above.
7. Referring in the number 6 facts of the case, assume that Manuel was terminated, which of the following is correct application of the law?
a. If Manuel was terminated without notice and hearing, Manuel's right to due process under the bill of rights was violated by the employer.
b. If Manuel was terminated without due process, Manuel's right to due process under the bill of rights was never violated by the employer.
c. Manuel is not violating anything especially true if the purpose of taking the video is to tell it the parents of Susana so that the latter may be disciplined.
d. Letters b and c are the correct applications of the law.
10. Which of the following is a correct statement?
a. Liberty means freedom to do everything you want.
b. There is liberty if only good is to be done and never bad.
c. Liberty can never be taken away
d. liberty is absolute
12. Which of the following is not correct?
A. Persons similarly situated must not be treated alike.
B. Persons of the same class must be treated alike.
C. laws may be applied differently depending on the class of the person but there is no violation of the equal protection of the law.
D. all of them are not correct.
18. Referring again in number 20 facts, this time you don't question the legality of the law, but you simply want that the ordinance should give exceptions to certain business operation such as disco-bar whose primary business is selling liquors. What branch of the local government should you submit this claim?
A. The local executive
B. The Local Legislative
C. The Lower Courts
D. All of the above
20. Which of the following is a correct principle of law?
A. All workers whether in the public or private sector are allowed to stage a strike.
B. All kinds of strike are protected by the constitution.
C. Employees in the government services cannot form union but allowed to strike.
D. Employees in the government services can form union but cannot stage a strike.
22. 1st. The right to travel can never be restricted by the government. 2nd. The government may take away the property of a person
A. 1st statement is absolutely correct, and the 2nd statement is not correct
B. 2nd statement is absolutely correct, and the first statement is not correct
C. Both 1st and 2nd statements are correct
D. both 1st and 2nd statements are not correct
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
![blur-text-image](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/includes/images/document_product_info/blur-text-image.webp)
Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
![blur-text-image](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/includes/images/document_product_info/blur-subtext-image.webp)
Step: 3
![blur-text-image](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/includes/images/document_product_info/blur-subtext-image.webp)
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started