Question
31. In Ohio, they have modified comparative fault. Assuming that Als eyes are injured by Toms negligent operation of a machine while both of them
31. In Ohio, they have modified comparative fault. Assuming that Als eyes are injured by Toms negligent operation of a machine while both of them worked together in Ohio. A jury decides that Tom is 50% at fault for injuries to Als eyes; they also decide that Al is contributorily negligent, and Al is therefore also 50% at fault for his own injury. If the jury also decides that $500,000 is adequate as compensatory damages for the loss of Als eyesight. How much money can Al recover from Tom given the jurys determination of these facts. a. $500,000 b. $250,000 c. 0
32. Assume the same facts as in questions 31 above but that the accident and injury occurred in Indiana after 1985, and that the Indiana rule of Modified Comparative Negligence applies. How much money can Al recover from Tom for the loss of his eyesight. a. $500,000 b. $250,000 c. 0
47. In California, they have comparative fault. Assuming that Als eyes are injured by Toms negligent operation of a machine while both of them worked together in California. A jury decides that Tom is 50% at fault for injuries to Als eyes; they also decide that Al is contributorily negligent, and Al is therefore also 50% at fault for his own injury. If the jury also decides that $500,000 is adequate as compensatory damages for the loss of Als eyesight. How much money can Al recover from Tom given the juries finding of facts. a. $500,000 b. $250,000 c. 0
48. Assume that all of the facts are as above but that the accident and injury occur in the state of Indiana in 1984 prior to the passage of the Comparative Fault Act, at that time Indiana still followed the common law rule regarding contributory negligence. How much could Al recover. a. $500,000 b. $250,000 c. 0
49. Assume the same facts as in questions 47 above but that the accident and injury occur in Indiana after 1985, and that the Indiana rule of Modified Comparative Negligence applies. How much money can Al recover from Tom a. $500,000 b. $250,000 c. 0
50. Assume the same facts as in Question 47 above, except that the accident and injury occur in the state of Ohio, and that the Ohio rule of Modified Comparative Negligence is applied. How much can Al recover. a. $500,000 b. $250,000 c. 0
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started