3.1 Our law appears to have developed [if that is an appropriate term] to the stage where even minor emotional twitches and unprovable so-called psychological harm can entail liability in damages for the luxury of being pampered by psychologists. We have moved far beyond the healthy robustness that should reasonably be expected of others so to become a society of whining wimps. Every person who hears or sees some disturbing event can now rush off to claim compensation. In light of the above statement discuss the South African law relating to delictual liability for negligently caused psychological harm, referring briefly to its development. Giving reasons indicate whether you agree with the above sentiments. (Total Q3.1: 15 marks) 3.2 Concisely describe the ambit of the so-called once and for all rule and briefly indicate what the practical implications of its application are. [Total Q3.2: 5 marks)