37. Bushel signed a contract with Aluminum Window Products Company to replace the windows and wooden window frames of his house with new ones made of aluminum. The salesperson asked Bushek to sign a "routine form" to help ensure that credit would be granted. The following day he read the "routine form" and discovered that he had, in fact, pledged the entire house as security, and if he defaulted on payments, the house could be taken from him. A. Is the contract Bushek signed legal? B. Does Bushek have the right to cancel the contract? c. If Bushek decides to cancel the contract, is he liable for damages? 38. Central City Garage Builders contracted with Morgan for the construction of a two-car garage and an attached greenhouse of similar size. The garage was built on schedule, but, because of a shortage of special materials, it appeared that the construction of the greenhouse would be delayed for several months. Central City requested payment for the entire contract. a. Does Central City have a legitimate claim that it had performed substantially? b. Can Central City claim that it was prevented from completing the project because of impossibility of performance? c. Would Central City have a right to request payment for the portion of the contract that was requested? 37. Bushel signed a contract with Aluminum Window Products Company to replace the windows and wooden window frames of his house with new ones made of aluminum. The salesperson asked Bushek to sign a "routine form" to help ensure that credit would be granted. The following day he read the "routine form" and discovered that he had, in fact, pledged the entire house as security, and if he defaulted on payments, the house could be taken from him. A. Is the contract Bushek signed legal? B. Does Bushek have the right to cancel the contract? c. If Bushek decides to cancel the contract, is he liable for damages? 38. Central City Garage Builders contracted with Morgan for the construction of a two-car garage and an attached greenhouse of similar size. The garage was built on schedule, but, because of a shortage of special materials, it appeared that the construction of the greenhouse would be delayed for several months. Central City requested payment for the entire contract. a. Does Central City have a legitimate claim that it had performed substantially? b. Can Central City claim that it was prevented from completing the project because of impossibility of performance? c. Would Central City have a right to request payment for the portion of the contract that was requested