4. (20 Points, Total, for this Question) - At Anna and Elsa's Un-Frozen Spring Fling" party, Olaf, who was both clumsy and much more than legally drunk, tripped and fell into a giant ice block (for sculpting) that Sven carelessly had left in the walkway to Anna and Elsa's castle. Even though a sober person easily might have avoided tripping over the block of ice, Olaf's injuries from this fall were severe, requiring multiple surgeries and extensive physiotherapy. Olaf's medical bills and loss of earnings (as an Arendale summer tour guide) reasonably totaled One Million Dollars ($1,000,000). After Sven, Elsa, and Anna had denied liability for causing Olaf's damages, Olaf sued them all. At trial, the jury found Anna and Elsa (as the owners of the castle and the sponsors of the party) together ten per cent (10%) responsible and Sven thirty-five per cent (35%) responsible for Olaf's injuries and losses. The jury also found Olaf fifty-five per cent (55%) responsible that is, mostly responsible - for causing his own damages. a. (10 Points for this Subpart) In California, a jurisdiction that recognizes pure comparative negligence, state what, if any, amount of money a jury would award Olaf based on these facts, and explain how you arrived at that answer. (HINT: After you specify a dollar amount that Olaf should win (It could be $0.) under the law, you may answer this Subpart fully with one or two sentences of explanation.] b. (10 Points for this Subpart) - If, instead, the case had been decided in a jurisdiction such as Indiana, which recognizes mixed comparative negligence, state what, if any, amount of money a jury would award Olaf based on those facts, and explain how you arrived at that answer. [HINT: After you specify a dollar amount that Olaf should win (It could be $0.) under the law, you may answer this Subpart fully with one or two sentences of explanation.]