4 Assume again that the company does not want to reduce sales of any product. Identify ways ves not want to reduce sales of any product. Identify ways the company could obtain the additional output. PROBLEM 9-7 Preparing a Make-or-Buy Analysis and Making an Equipment Replacement Decision TL01 - CC2, 3] "In my opinion, we ought to stop making our own drums and accept that outside supplier's offer," said Wim Niewindt, managing director of Antilles CHECK FIGURE Refining, N.V., of Aruba. "At a price of 36 florins per drum, we would be (1) Advantage to make: paying 10 florins less than it costs us to manufacture the drums in our own Afl126,000 plant. (The currency in Aruba is the florin, denoted by Afl.) Since we use 120,000 drums a year, we would save 600,000 florins on an annual basis." Antilles Refining's present cost to manufacture one drum follows (based on 120,000 drums per year): 468 Af12070 Direct material 12.00 Direct labour 3.00 Variable overhead overhead (Af15.60 general company overhead, Af13.20 depreciation, and Afl1.50 supervision) 10.30 Af146.00 Total cost per drum ne, since the equipment being facing the company are a A decision about whether to make or buy the drums is especially important at this time, since the equin used to make the drums is completely worn out and must be replaced. The choices facing the com follows: company uses straight-line Alternative 1: Purchase new equipment and continue to make the drums. The equipment Afl1,620,000; it would have a six-year useful life and no salvage value. The company uses str depreciation. Alternative 2: Purchase the drums from an outside supplier at Af136 per drum under a six-year contract The new equipment would be more efficient than the equipment that Antilles Refining has been using and acon to the manufacturer, would reduce direct labour and variable overhead costs by 30%. The old equipment resale value. Supervision cost (Afl180,000 per year) and direct materials cost per drum would not be affected by the new equipment. The new equipment's capacity would be 180,000 drums per year. The company has no other use for the space being used to produce the drums. The company's total general company overhead would be unaffected by this decision. Required: 1. To assist the managing director in making a decision, prepare an analysis showing the total cost and the cost per drum under each of the two alternatives stated previously. Assume that 120,000 drums are needed each year. Which course of action would you recommend to the managing director? 2. Would your recommendation in part (1) be the same if the company's needs were (a) 150,000 drums per year! (b) 180,000 drums per year? Show computations to support your answer, with costs presented on both a total and a per-unit basis. 3. What other factors would you recommend that the company consider before making a decision? 4 Assume again that the company does not want to reduce sales of any product. Identify ways ves not want to reduce sales of any product. Identify ways the company could obtain the additional output. PROBLEM 9-7 Preparing a Make-or-Buy Analysis and Making an Equipment Replacement Decision TL01 - CC2, 3] "In my opinion, we ought to stop making our own drums and accept that outside supplier's offer," said Wim Niewindt, managing director of Antilles CHECK FIGURE Refining, N.V., of Aruba. "At a price of 36 florins per drum, we would be (1) Advantage to make: paying 10 florins less than it costs us to manufacture the drums in our own Afl126,000 plant. (The currency in Aruba is the florin, denoted by Afl.) Since we use 120,000 drums a year, we would save 600,000 florins on an annual basis." Antilles Refining's present cost to manufacture one drum follows (based on 120,000 drums per year): 468 Af12070 Direct material 12.00 Direct labour 3.00 Variable overhead overhead (Af15.60 general company overhead, Af13.20 depreciation, and Afl1.50 supervision) 10.30 Af146.00 Total cost per drum ne, since the equipment being facing the company are a A decision about whether to make or buy the drums is especially important at this time, since the equin used to make the drums is completely worn out and must be replaced. The choices facing the com follows: company uses straight-line Alternative 1: Purchase new equipment and continue to make the drums. The equipment Afl1,620,000; it would have a six-year useful life and no salvage value. The company uses str depreciation. Alternative 2: Purchase the drums from an outside supplier at Af136 per drum under a six-year contract The new equipment would be more efficient than the equipment that Antilles Refining has been using and acon to the manufacturer, would reduce direct labour and variable overhead costs by 30%. The old equipment resale value. Supervision cost (Afl180,000 per year) and direct materials cost per drum would not be affected by the new equipment. The new equipment's capacity would be 180,000 drums per year. The company has no other use for the space being used to produce the drums. The company's total general company overhead would be unaffected by this decision. Required: 1. To assist the managing director in making a decision, prepare an analysis showing the total cost and the cost per drum under each of the two alternatives stated previously. Assume that 120,000 drums are needed each year. Which course of action would you recommend to the managing director? 2. Would your recommendation in part (1) be the same if the company's needs were (a) 150,000 drums per year! (b) 180,000 drums per year? Show computations to support your answer, with costs presented on both a total and a per-unit basis. 3. What other factors would you recommend that the company consider before making a decision