4. ' Bo was the owner of Lot No. I on which he had built his home . Sadia owned the adjoining, Lots NO . 2 and & which were undeveloped , along with Lot No. 4 on which Sadia's home was located Bo wished to acquire Lot NO . 2 in order to protect his home site from crowding if Lot No . 2 should be sold to a stranger . Meeting Sadia on the street on January 2 , Bo explained his wish to acquire Lot No . 2 and offered to buy it from Sadia for $ 75, 4010 cash . Sadia agreed and promised to deliver a deed to Lot No . 2 in 4\\ weeks . BO paid S $ 1, JOU is a deposit or down payment towards the purchase price OfS ;5. QUO. ON February 1 , Sadia told Bo that she had changed her mind Bo demands that Sadia perform the contract Sadia contends that if there is any contract , it is unenforceable . Lay Was there an offer and acceptance sufficient to constitute a contact between Sadia and Bo ? Explain . by In an action by. Bo against Badis for breach of contract , judgment for whom ? Explain . ( C) Assume that on January 10, Bo sent to Sadia his check for $ 1, and bearing the notation " On account of purchase price of Lot No . ?" and that Sadia cashed the check , but later refused to convey Lot No . 2. Would EO's payment constitute sufficient part* performance to enable Bo to Enforce the contract against Sadia ? Explain . I'd ; If the contract is not Enforceable , may Go recover his $ 1, Jam ? Explain . IF] ASSUME that in addition to the payment , Bo, with Sadia 's knowledge and consent , Entered on Lot No . 2 and had it cleared of brush on January 20 at a cost of $150, but Sadia still refused to convey . Would Bo be entitled to obtain a decree of specific performance to compel Sadia to deliver a deed to Lot . No. 2 To Bo upon paving to Gadis the balance of $74, DON'T Explain . IF] Would Bo be Entitled to recover his $ 1, YOU payment plus the SISU cost of clearing the land ? Explain . IFI Assume that on March 1 . Bo instituted a suit for specific performance and that Sadia denied she had agreed to sell . At the trial, the court decided that BO was telling the truth , and ordered Sadia to Execute and deliver to Be a deed to Lot . No. 2 upon BO paving the balance of $74, Guo . Is Sadia Entitled to have the decision reversed on appeal , if on the appeal Sadia raises for the first time the defense that her Agreement was not in a writing Signed by the party to be charged ? Explain