Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

#4 EXHIBIT 1 | Projects' Free Cash Flows (dollars in thousands) Project number: 1 2 3 4 5 Initial Investment $(2,000) $(2,000) S(2,000) $(2,000) $(2,000)

#4 image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
EXHIBIT 1 | Projects' Free Cash Flows (dollars in thousands) Project number: 1 2 3 4 5 Initial Investment $(2,000) $(2,000) S(2,000) $(2,000) $(2,000) 8 $(2,000) $1,666 334" 165 6 7 $(2,000) $(2,000) $ 2,200 $1,200 900* 300 90 $ (350) (60) 60 350 700 1.200 $2,250 70 Year 1 $ 330 2 330 3 330 330 5 330 330 7 330* 8 $1,000 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Sum of cash flow benefits $3,310 Excess of cash flow over initial investment $1,310 $ 160 $ 280 200 280 350 280 395 280 432 280 440" 280 442 280 444 280" 446 280 448 280 450 280 451 280 451 280 452 280 $(2.000) $ 280 $10,000" $2,165 $10,000 $ 3,561 $4.200 $ 2,200 $2,560 $ 4,150 $ 165 $ 8,000 $ 1,561 $2.200 $ 200 $ 560 $ 2,150 I T indicates year in which paytsack was accomplished. To stimulate your analysis, consider the following questions: 1. Can you rank the projects simply by inspecting the cash flows? 2. What criteria might you use to rank the projects? Which quantitative ranking methods are better? Why? 3. What is the ranking you found by using quantitative methods? Does this ranking differ from the ranking obtained by simple inspection of the cash flows? 4. What kinds of real investment projects have cash flows similar to those in Exhibit 1? EXHIBIT 1 | Projects' Free Cash Flows (dollars in thousands) Project number: 1 2 3 4 5 Initial Investment $(2,000) $(2,000) S(2,000) $(2,000) $(2,000) 8 $(2,000) $1,666 334" 165 6 7 $(2,000) $(2,000) $ 2,200 $1,200 900* 300 90 $ (350) (60) 60 350 700 1.200 $2,250 70 Year 1 $ 330 2 330 3 330 330 5 330 330 7 330* 8 $1,000 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Sum of cash flow benefits $3,310 Excess of cash flow over initial investment $1,310 $ 160 $ 280 200 280 350 280 395 280 432 280 440" 280 442 280 444 280" 446 280 448 280 450 280 451 280 451 280 452 280 $(2.000) $ 280 $10,000" $2,165 $10,000 $ 3,561 $4.200 $ 2,200 $2,560 $ 4,150 $ 165 $ 8,000 $ 1,561 $2.200 $ 200 $ 560 $ 2,150 I T indicates year in which paytsack was accomplished. To stimulate your analysis, consider the following questions: 1. Can you rank the projects simply by inspecting the cash flows? 2. What criteria might you use to rank the projects? Which quantitative ranking methods are better? Why? 3. What is the ranking you found by using quantitative methods? Does this ranking differ from the ranking obtained by simple inspection of the cash flows? 4. What kinds of real investment projects have cash flows similar to those in Exhibit 1

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Bakers Health Care Finance Basic Tools For Nonfinancial Managers

Authors: Thomas K. Ross

6th Edition

1284233162, 978-1284233162

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

What are the HRM implications of this type of merger?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

What is an RPIC, and where was it required?

Answered: 1 week ago