41 56 56 47 52 63 60 62 49 60 56 52 58 43 63 -0.6224147648 ID AgeEnrollmenAge1stArrest Education NumerTimesFired 6 41 20 12 1 7 56 14 12 1 8 56 12 14 0 9 47 23 12 0 10 52 38 12 3 11 63 16 14 0 12 60 59 12 1 13 62 17 12 3 14 49 19 11 2 15 60 31 13 0 16 56 28 12 3 17 52 43 12 0 18 58 27 14 0 19 43 29 12 0 20 63 42 14 0 -3.660E-017 -0.62241476 0.99012865 0.65752451 0.95523026 SKEWNESS Plot the frequency distribution for \"Age at Enrollment\" by hand or by using SPSS. How would you characterize the skewness of the distribution in Question 1positively skewed, neg Compare the original skewness statistic and Shapiro-Wilk statistic with those of the smaller dataset would you explain these differences? Plot the frequency distribution for \"Years of Education\" by hand or by using SPSS. How would you characterize the kurtosis of the distribution in Question 4leptokurtic, mesokur-tic What is the skewness statistic for \"Age at Enrollment\"? How would you characterize the mag-nitude What is the kurtosis statistic for \"Years of Education\"? How would you characterize the magni-tude Using SPSS, compute the Shapiro-Wilk statistic for \"Number of Times Fired from Job.\" What would y In the SPSS output table titled \"Tests of Normality,\" the Shapiro-Wilk statistic is reported along with Smirnov statistic inappropriate to report for these example data? How would you explain the skewness statistic for a particular frequency distribution being low and using SPSS. tion 1positively skewed, negatively skewed, or approximately normal? Provide a rationale for your answer. h those of the smaller dataset ( n = 15) for the variable \"Age at First Arrest.\" How did the statistics change, and how using SPSS. on 4leptokurtic, mesokur-tic, or platykurtic? Provide a rationale for your answer. u characterize the mag-nitude of the skewness statistic for \"Age at Enrollment\"? characterize the magni-tude of the kurtosis statistic for \"Years of Education\"? Fired from Job.\" What would you conclude from the results? statistic is reported along with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic. Why is the Kolmogorov- cy distribution being low and the Shapiro-Wilk statistic still being signi cant at p < 0.05? r your answer. tics change, and how