5 10 15 Describe the case. Be sure to highlight the main points. Ensure you are covering all relevant Information so others who have not read the case would understand it. CWTER 1: Legal Foundations 1. McDonald's was notified of the burns to Stella Liebeck before she filed a lawsuit. At that time, McDonald's was considering their legal strategy. Describe in your own words 3 STRATEGIC LEGAL options, as indicated in your textbook, that McDonald's could have taken after bearing of the burns to Stella Liebeck. 2. For each option, name the option and provide an analysis of the legal and financial implications of each potential decision 3. Which would you choose? Explain. CHAPTER 4: Resolving Disputes: Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution 1. Name methods of discovery that you think would apply to this case. Explain each method of Siscovery and provide an example of how it could be used in the Lebeck cane specifically 2. McDonald's wanted to avoid a lawsuit, name Two types of alternative dispute resolutions (ADR) that McDonald's could consider 2. Define each of the two types of a you selected. The state which one would be most appropriate for McDonald's and why. CHAPTER 7: Contract Enforceability and Performance 1. Assume that McDonald's advertised to customers that their coffee can be immediately consumed because it is warmed toatemperature of 130 degrees and never any higher Use the facts presented in the case, along with this new information to determine whether McDonald's could be proven able for misrepresentation. To do this, list the three elements that must be proven to win mbrementation wit. After each element provide an explanation as to whether you think each dement could be proven given the situation above 2. What additional element would need to be provenfor Stelle Liebeck to win a fraudulent misrepresentation lawsuit at McDon't Do you think this element is present in the sen 15 I U B M Fant sabied because your inductis inact. To for an in and in the Web version Active thee.com appropriate for McDonald's and why 15 CWTER 7: Contract Enforceability and performance 1. Assume that McDonald's advertised to customers that the coffee can be inmediately Coed because it warmed to a temperature of 180 degrees and new any higher. Use the facts presented in the case, along with this new information, to determine whether McDonald's could be proven able for mis presentation. To do this, test the three elements that must be proven to win a mi presentation lawsuit Alter each element, provide an explanation as to whether you thank each element could be proven given the situation above 2. What additional element would need to be proven for Selbeck to win a fraudulent mivepresentation Lawsuit against McDonald's? Do you think this element is present in this case? Explain Nume and define in your own words the four remedies cisnied in the textbook. Which remedies were used in this case? Explain 15 CUPTER 9 Torts and Product liability 1 Why do you think McDonald's was batle for pence? To determine this, Ist each of the decents of negligence and provide an analysis for each that discuss whether you think that element was proven in this 2. While jury awarded Stella Liebeck 200.000, they stated that she was 20% dit for her bum. Name the specific defense that is used to some blame to the plaintif, thereby the defendants de la 3. If the red bed 200,000 but at she was 20% af how much di P K EL M 5 10 15 Describe the case. Be sure to highlight the main points. Ensure you are covering all relevant Information so others who have not read the case would understand it. CWTER 1: Legal Foundations 1. McDonald's was notified of the burns to Stella Liebeck before she filed a lawsuit. At that time, McDonald's was considering their legal strategy. Describe in your own words 3 STRATEGIC LEGAL options, as indicated in your textbook, that McDonald's could have taken after bearing of the burns to Stella Liebeck. 2. For each option, name the option and provide an analysis of the legal and financial implications of each potential decision 3. Which would you choose? Explain. CHAPTER 4: Resolving Disputes: Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution 1. Name methods of discovery that you think would apply to this case. Explain each method of Siscovery and provide an example of how it could be used in the Lebeck cane specifically 2. McDonald's wanted to avoid a lawsuit, name Two types of alternative dispute resolutions (ADR) that McDonald's could consider 2. Define each of the two types of a you selected. The state which one would be most appropriate for McDonald's and why. CHAPTER 7: Contract Enforceability and Performance 1. Assume that McDonald's advertised to customers that their coffee can be immediately consumed because it is warmed toatemperature of 130 degrees and never any higher Use the facts presented in the case, along with this new information to determine whether McDonald's could be proven able for misrepresentation. To do this, list the three elements that must be proven to win mbrementation wit. After each element provide an explanation as to whether you think each dement could be proven given the situation above 2. What additional element would need to be provenfor Stelle Liebeck to win a fraudulent misrepresentation lawsuit at McDon't Do you think this element is present in the sen 15 I U B M Fant sabied because your inductis inact. To for an in and in the Web version Active thee.com appropriate for McDonald's and why 15 CWTER 7: Contract Enforceability and performance 1. Assume that McDonald's advertised to customers that the coffee can be inmediately Coed because it warmed to a temperature of 180 degrees and new any higher. Use the facts presented in the case, along with this new information, to determine whether McDonald's could be proven able for mis presentation. To do this, test the three elements that must be proven to win a mi presentation lawsuit Alter each element, provide an explanation as to whether you thank each element could be proven given the situation above 2. What additional element would need to be proven for Selbeck to win a fraudulent mivepresentation Lawsuit against McDonald's? Do you think this element is present in this case? Explain Nume and define in your own words the four remedies cisnied in the textbook. Which remedies were used in this case? Explain 15 CUPTER 9 Torts and Product liability 1 Why do you think McDonald's was batle for pence? To determine this, Ist each of the decents of negligence and provide an analysis for each that discuss whether you think that element was proven in this 2. While jury awarded Stella Liebeck 200.000, they stated that she was 20% dit for her bum. Name the specific defense that is used to some blame to the plaintif, thereby the defendants de la 3. If the red bed 200,000 but at she was 20% af how much di P K EL M