Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

5. Rinn v. Parent Seeds Ltd. (2001), 156 Man. R. (2d) 191 (C.A.). Rinn had a contract to supply a quantity of black and white

5. Rinn v. Parent Seeds Ltd. (2001), 156 Man. R. (2d) 191 (C.A.).

Rinn had a contract to supply a quantity of black and white beans to Parent Seeds Ltd.

Untortunately, Rinn's crop was damaged by frost and he couldn't deliver the beans from his

tarm. He then mnade arrangements to obtain the beans from another source and Parent

accepted the alternative white beans supplied, not knowing Rinn didn't grow them. Parent

refused to take delivery of the black beans, claiming that the contract had been trustrated.

Explain the arguments that could be advanced by both parties. How would it

affect your answer to learn that the contract required the delivery of specific black

beans grown by Rinn with seed supplied by Parent?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Legal Environment Of Business

Authors: Henry R. Cheeseman

9th Edition

0135173957, 978-0135173954

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

13. Give four examples of psychological Maginot lines.

Answered: 1 week ago