50). X. AN INTERIOR DESIGNER, AGREES TO DECORATE Y'S LIVING ROOM FOR A SPECIFIED PRICE, WITH THE CONTRACT PROVIDING THAT X GUARANTEES Y'S \"TOTAL-SATISFACTION\" WITH THE JOB. WHEN THE WORK IS DONE, Y ' CLAIMS HE IS NOT SATISFIED. IN SUCH A CASE: (A) 1F THE COURT FEELS THE CONTRACT WAS ONE ESSENTIALLY INVOLVING SUBJ ECT IVE MATTERS. SUCH AS Y'S PERSONAL COLOR LIKES AND DISLIKES AND IF Y'S DISSATISFACTION IS GENUINE. Y MAY ESCAPE LIABILITY TO X (B) IF THE COURT FEELS THAT A REASONABLE MAN WOULD HAVE BEEN SATISFIED WITH X'S PERFORMANCE, EVENTHOUGH IT ESSENTIALLY INVOLVED SUBJECTIVE MATTERS AS IN (A) ABOVE. I! WILL PROBABLY BE HELD LIABLE TO x._ ' - (C) IF THE COURT FEELS THE CONTRACT WAS ONE ESSENTIALLY INVOLVING MATTERS OF UTILITY OR MERE MECHANICAL FITNESS (RATHER THAN SUBJECTIVE MATTERS), Y WILL PROBABLY BE HELD LIABLE EVEN IF HE IS PERSONALLY DISSATISFIED AND EVEN IF A REASONABLE MAN WOULD BE ' DISSATISFIED WITH x's WORK. (1)) B AND I: . (E) A AND B