6. Osburn, who owned certain timber land. contracted to cut. peel. haul. and deliver all the hemlock bark upon his lands to the Elk Tanning Co.. which owned a tannery in the vicinity. Subsequently Osborn attempted to sell the bark from his land elsewhere, and the Elk Taming Co. led a bill in equity paying for specic performance. and alleging that it was necessary for them to have this bark for tanning, that the supply of such bark was limited. and that the loss of it would cause irreparable injury to the cempany. which had erected the tannery at great expense. The defendant, Osborn. objected that equin had no jurisdiction. and that plaintiffs had a adequate remedy at law. Should a decree issue