7 . Eva and Maria entered into a written (b) Instead of the assumption in (a), contract pursuant to which Eva was to assume that on September 5, Cecelia orally render decorating services for Maria for a agreed to accept $9,000 in full payment of total price of $75,000 . After the services had Digna's debt if Digna paid before September been performed, a good faith dispute arose 10. Digna paid Cecelia $9,000 on between Eva and Maria over whether all of September 8. On September 15, Cecelia the services had been properly performed. sued Digna for $1,000. How much, if Eva claimed that the full amount was due, anything, will Cecelia recover from Digna? but Maria argued that only $50,000 worth of Explain . services had been performed. After several (c) Would your answer to (b) be weeks of argument, Maria sent a check for different if Cecelia agreed in a signed writing $60,000 to Eva on which Maria had written o accept $9,000 in full payment of Digna's "payment in full for decorating services ." debt ? Explain a) Eva endorsed the check, without making any further notations on it, deposited it and sued Maria for Camila, a building contractor, the remaining $15,000 she claims entered into a written agreement with Owen, is due. Judgment for whom? the owner of 27 Y Street , to build a new wing Explain. on Owen's house for $90,000 . After the work (b) Instead of the facts in (a) assume was one-half done, Camila complained that Eva wrote "under protest" on about the rising cost of materials and the check when she endorsed it stopped work. Owen said to Camila: "If you and , after depositing it, sues Maria go ahead and finish the job, I'll pay you a for $15,000. What result? bonus of $10,000." Camila agreed and Explain. finished the job. Camila then demanded (c) Instead of the facts in (a) and (b). payment of $100,000, but Owen refused to assume that Eva and Maria had a pay more than $90,000 . telephone conversation in which (a) How much may Camila collect from Eva agreed to take $60,000 in full Owen ? Explain satisfaction of Maria's obligation (b) Assume that Camila wrote on the under the contract. Maria then bottom of the written contract, "The agreed sent the check, with a letter price for the above work is $100,000" and referencing the telephone said to Owen: "I'll go ahead if you sign that," conversation. Eva wrote "under which Owen did. How much may Camila protest" on the check, endorsed collect from Owen ? Explain and deposited it, and then sued Maria for $15,000. What result? 10. Armand was hired to work as the Explain. chef for the restaurant at Scallop's seaside resort for 3 months during the summer, 8. Digna owed Cecelia $10,000 under under a written contract that provided that a valid loan agreement. Payment was due Armand would receive compensation of on September 1. Digna informed Cecelia $50,000. During the first month, the guests that she was unable to pay on September 1 . were wildly enthusiastic about the quality of (a) Assume that on September 5, the food and Scallop's reservations for the cecelia orally agreed to accept $8,000 plus resort and restaurant doubled . Noticing this the transfer of Digna's stamp collection Armand felt he was entitled to share in (which Cecelia admired) as payment in full, Scallop's increased profits. During a if Digna would do so by September 10. conversation, Scallop promised to pay Digna did pay the $8,000 and transferred Armand a $20,000 bonus at the end of the the stamp collection to Cecelia on summer if he continued to work under his September 8. The stamp collection had a contract. At the end of the three months, market value of $1,000. On September 15, Scallop paid Armand $50,000 and refused to Cecelia sued Digna for the $1,000 balance pay the $20,000 bonus he had promised. Cecelia claims is due. How much, if Armand sued Scallop for breach of contract. anything, will Cecelia recover from Digna? Judgment for whom ? Explain Explain