7. Regarding precedent: In the instant case [the case before us], there was mention that this case may set a bad \"precedent\" for the music industry; in legal terms, what does this mean? 8. With regards to the monetary damages being sought, this case was likely one At Law or In Equity? 9. Was this a state or federal case? 10. Which tier was this case heard at? 11. Was this case a jury or bench trial? 12. In which state was the case heard? 13. Did this case likely involve interstate or intrastate commerce? 14. Did this case involve a fundamental right? 15. Was this case based on Federal Diversity of Citizenship? 16. Was the Long Arm statute used in this case? (Chapter 4) 17. Did the federal court have subject matterjurisdiction over this case? (Chapter 4) 18. Evidence was presented in the trial thru witnesses or thru briefs? (Chapter 4) 19. Was trial the only option for this case? (Chapter 4) 20. Can the losing party appeal this case? (Chapter 4) 21 . At the end of one of the clips, the analyst mentioned that the family has the right to ask that future sales of the song be prohibited. What is the name of this type of order? 22. Is the remedy in #21 one At Law or Equity? Bonus +10: Answer both 1. In your opinion, \"just based" on what you saw and heard in the videos, does it appear there was a \"violation?\" AND Briefly explain. Place answer in the submission box