707 - Tutorial Information - ICL X Assignment 1: Case Study 3 - ICL X LII 2022 FC 252 (CanLII) | Elias v. Car X Assignment 2: Preparing for a Ce X + le/content/900327/viewContent/5334757/View I itast ellsuit ulial you are IaIIIIIIal WILIT TIE UllIVEISILy S aLauEITIL ItyInLy PUILIES, TEPIUUUCEU III JELLIUIT 5.1 of the GDiplCL Handbook of Academic Regulations before you upload this assignment. Detailed Instructions Assessment Instructions Read the Federal Court's decision in Elias v (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 252 (you can find the case on CanLii at www.canlii.org), and answer the following questions: 1. Explain, citing the relevant portion(s) of the legislation and what concerns were raised by the IAD regarding Ms. Elias' sponsorship application. 2. Did the Court agree or disagree with the arguments being advanced by the Applicant in that case? Use specific examples from the case in explaining your answer. 3. Find a relevant case that, had you been counsel for the Applicant in Elias, you would have provided in support of the case. Explain its relevance and application. Your analysis should include at least one (1) citation to an IAD/Federal Court decision to support your answer. The citation that you use to support your answer should not be relied on in the reasons set out by the Federal Court in Elias. Academic Integrity and the use of generative Al Tools READ CAREFULLY: You must do your own work in this assignment and cite and/or acknowledge any work that is not yours