A $20-$year$-$old woman, Lynn$,$ is halfway through her first season as an assistant rock guide. She works alongside a senior rock guide who has ten years of experience. They are instructing a rock climbing class at a local crag. Nearby is a couple who are literally learning the ropes. Lynn notices they$$re novices and, fearful that they$$re going to kill them$-$selves, offers some general tips on how to belay $($hold the rope to catch any fall$)$ and climb. Over the course of the day, the couple asks Lynn several questions, and she oblig$-$ingly answers them. In the mid$-$afternoon, one of the climbers is badly hurt on a route after falling and hitting the ground because of an improper belay. The injured climber sues Lynn claiming that she was negligent in tell$-$ing them what to do$,$ that he was induced into trying some$-$thing he wasn$$t ready to do$,$ that she in effect certified the belayer as competent, and that she was effectively supervis$-$ing them$$albeit unofficially$$and failed to do so$.$ Question: How would the Court look at this lawsuit?