A 20-year-old woman, Lynn, is halfway through her first season as an assistant rock guide. She works alongside a senior rock guide who has ten years of experience. They are instructing a rock climbing class at a local crag. Nearby is a couple who are literally learning the ropes. Lynn notices theyre novices and, fearful that theyre going to kill themselves, offers some general tips on how to belay (hold the rope to catch any fall) and climb. Over the course of the day, the couple asks Lynn several questions, and she obligingly answers them. In the mid-afternoon, one of the climbers is badly hurt on a route after falling and hitting the ground because of an improper belay. The injured climber sues Lynn claiming that she was negligent in telling them what to do, that he was induced into trying something he wasnt ready to do, that she in effect certified the belayer as competent, and that she was effectively supervising themalbeit unofficiallyand failed to do so.

Question: How would the Court look at this lawsuit?