A 3) As part of her campaign for the presidency of the U.S., one candidate plans to target different age groups of voters with different campaign materials depending upon their support of her proposal that the US. Congress eliminate earmark funding to existing iegislation. Earmarking is the process whereby congressional representatives and senators can add additional funding for projects for their constituents back in their home districts. This presidential candidate found a 95% condence interval for the difference in the proportion of voters under 35 years old minus the proportion of voters over 35 years old voters who support her proposal is (0.0523, 0.0134) . Note that sample 1 is from the voters under 35 years old and sample 2 is from the voters over 35 years old. Select the best answer. 0 We are 95% condent that there is no statistically signicant difference in the proportion of the two voting groups who favor her proposal to eliminate earmark funding. 0 We are 95% condent that the proportion of voters under 35 years old who favor her proposal to eliminate earmark funding is greaterthan the proportion ofvoters over 35 years old who favor her proposal to eliminate earmark funding. a Q We are 95% condent that the proportion of voters under 35 years old who favor her proposal to eliminate earmark funding is less than the proportion of voters over 35 years old who favor her proposal to eliminate earmark funding. 0 None of the above