a. Answers to questions presented in the text b. Decision/conclusion reached by the Court. Be sure to discuss the substantive rule of law, not simply identifying the party prevailing in the case. c. Your reasoned opinion as to whether the Court made the correct decision. sur- ED - his nce. law wide -nce e an 7. on s to luty gen- Sell aused UI' Contributed to the loss, as he was in the restaurant at the time the money disappeared. How do you believe the court resolved this dispute? Why? [Zinner v Advanced Parking Server 25), avail able at: http://law.justia.com/casesevr other courts/2015/2015-ny-slip-op-25246.html Plaintiff Caruso was gambling at the Foxwoods Casino, which was owned by defendant Mashan- tucket Pequot Gaming Enterprise. When he went to use the restroom, Caruso noticed an attendant holding a mop in his hand. Almost immediately thereafter, Caruso slipped and fell on the floor in an area that had just been mopped. To gain com- pensation for the injuries he suffered from the fall, he sued the casino for negligence for failing to place warning signs or cones around the just- mopped area. The casino argued that contributory negligence on the part of Caruso in failing to pay attention to his surroundings in light of the obvi- ousness of the danger should bar him from recover- ing. How do you believe the court ruled in this case and why? [Caruso v. Mashantucket Pequot Gaming Enterprise, 2010 WL 323079 (Mash. Pequot Tribal Ct. 2010).] sal, nity luty "hat the fen- - of eals 00.] ank to