A boater and a water skier were involved in a boating accident. Shortly after the accident, the water skier prepared a written summary of the events surrounding the accident. At trial two years later, the water skier is on the stand and is unable to accurately recall the details of the accident, even after reviewing the aforementioned account of the accident. Assuming a proper foundation is laid, may the summary of the accident be read into evidence? Group of answer choices Yes, even though hearsay, because the out-of-court declarant is on the stand and is capable of being cross-examined. No, because the best evidence is the writing itself. Yes, because the water skier's memory of the actual event is insufficient. Yes, because it refreshes the water skier's recollection