A core contention of some scholars who are critical of the LIO, but who nonetheless support the creation of robust international institutions, call for subsidiarity. This is the idea that to be effective the international system should actually feature a number of regional organizations that talk to each other. In this way rather than try to create a one-sized, global system, we would get a set of regional bodies that could be more attentive to the nuances of each region. Do you think subsidiarity would work? Or, do you think that it really is necessary to have a truly global system? Weight the pros and cons of each approach. A core contention of some scholars who are critical of the LIO, but who nonetheless support the creation of robust international institutions, call for subsidiarity. This is the idea that to be effective the international system should actually feature a number of regional organizations that talk to each other. In this way rather than try to create a one-sized, global system, we would get a set of regional bodies that could be more attentive to the nuances of each region. Do you think subsidiarity would work? Or, do you think that it really is necessary to have a truly global system? Weight the pros and cons of each approach.