A. Empirical article review (30 points) 1. Klaauw, B. v. d. (2014). From Micro Data to Causality: Forty Years of Empirical Labor Economics. Discussion Paper Series: IZA DP No. 8047 IZA, Institute of Labor Economics. Bonn, Germany. 2. Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (1997). Computing Inequality: Have Computers Changed The Labor Market? NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 5956, National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA. 3. Acemoglu, D. (1998). Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), 1055-1089. 4. Ariel R. Belasen and Solomon W. Polachek, How Disasters Affect Local Labor Markets: The Effects of Hurricanes in Florida. Journal of Human Resources 44 (Winter 2009): 251-276. Each article review must be a maximum 2 pages long, approximately 10 paragraphs. The first page should summarize the article, including its motivation, theoretical framework, critical assumptions, econometrics methods, and main results. The second page should answer the following three questions: 1. What question does the study ask and in what context? Why is this of economic interest? What are the most important findings in the paper? 2. Which assumptions support a causal interpretation of the results presented in your chosen paper? Are these assumptions discussed appropriately? Are the econometric techniques used in the study likely to yield estimates with a causal interpretation? Do these techniques appear to have been correctly implemented? Are the results convincing? 3. Finally, the bulk of this part should consider where this paper fits in the relevant literature. What were the findings at the time the paper was written? What is this paper's contribution? What has been done on this topic since this paper was published? Are the paper's findings still relevant? Each article review must be typesetted in MS WORD with an 11-point font size, 1.15 space line, and 2.5 margins and submitted in PDF format