A father was interrogated about suspected child abuse and was falsely informed by the police that three doctors concluded that his child was injured as a result of violent shaking. The father then confessed to having shaken the child. When a court examines the confession is it likely to be admissible? Group of answer choices No, because this confession was involuntary because not being a medical expert he had no way to to contradict what was falsely present to him as settled medical opinion Yes, because there is no evidence of coercion No, because police deception violates the Due Process clause Yes, because there is no evidence the confession was not voluntary