A huge purchaser merchandise organization ran a TV commercial for one of its cleanser items. Based on an overview that was led, probabilities were appointed to the accompanying occasions. B 5 s 5 B > s 5 individual bought the item singular saw the promotion individual bought the item and saw the notice The probabilities doled out were P(B) = .20, P(S) = .40, and P(B S) = .12.

What is the likelihood of a person's buying the item given that the individual saw the promotion? Does seeing the promotion increment the likelihood that the individual will buy the item? As a leader, would you suggest proceeding with the promotion (expecting that the expense is sensible)?

Accept that people who don't buy the organization's cleanser item purchase from its rivals. What might be your gauge of the organization's piece of the overall industry? Would you expect that proceeding with the notice will expand the organization's piece of the overall industry? Why or why not?

The organization likewise tried another commercial and doled out it upsides of P(S) = .30 and P(B S) = .10. What is P(B S) for this other commercial? Which ad appears to have had the greater impact on client buys?

Of the 20 understudies talked with, 9 took swimming, 10 took Taekwando and 12 took Piano exercises. Besides, 4 took both swimming and Taekwando, 5 took both swimming and piano, 6 took both piano and Taekwando, and 2 took all exercises. In the event that one of them will be chosen indiscriminately, what is the likelihood of choosing an understudy who

a. took either swimming or piano or Taekwando exercises

b. took both swimming and Taekwando however not a piano exercise

c. took neither swimming not Taekwando

d. didn't take both swimming and piano exercise

e. took either swimming or piano however NOT Taekwando

In August 2012, typhoon Isaac framed in the Caribbean and was set out toward the

Bay of Mexico. There was an underlying likelihood of .69 that Isaac would turn into a typhoon when it arrived at the Gulf of Mexico ( National Hurricane Center site,

August 21, 2..*@26-

a. What was the likelihood that Isaac would not turn into a typhoon yet stay a hurricane when it arrived at the Gulf of Mexico?

b. After two days, the National Hurricane Center extended the way of Isaac would pass

straight over Cuba prior to arriving at the Gulf of Mexico. How did disregarding Cuba

modify the likelihood that Isaac would turn into a tropical storm when it arrived at the

Inlet of Mexico? Utilize the accompanying probabilities to address this inquiry. Tropical storms

that arrive at the Gulf of Mexico have a .08 likelihood of having disregarded Cuba.

Typhoons that arrive at the Gulf of Mexico have a .20 likelihood of having passed

over Cuba.

c. What befalls the likelihood of turning into a typhoon when a hurricane passes

over a landmass like Cuba?